- Busch: Markets Smell a Country Rat
- Schork Oil Outlook: Mission Impossible For The Bears?
- Losey: Asset Allocation At Retirement
- Farrell: Obama Hectored, Ignored and Restricted?
- Don't Dwell on Investment Mistakes; Move on, Like Buffett
- Hirschhorn: Greed...or Fear
- Schork Oil Outlook: Some New Hope For Nat Gas Bulls
- Insights for Growing the Economy: the State of Entrepreneurship
- Tamminen: California Is At It Again
- Dorn: Trading Secrets and Serendipity
MOST SHARED
- The 'Real' Jobless Rate: 17.5% Of Workers Are Unemployed
- Why Amazon Rules Retail
- Wave of Debt Payments Facing US Government
- Paul: Audit the Fed
- China Eastern to Complete Shanghai Air Buy by End '09
- The Social Media Gaming Threat
- Gold Will Collapse Like Oil Did in 2008: Charts
- JAL Slides to Record Low on Bankruptcy Jitters
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Holiday Travel Outlook
- Can Murdoch Help Bing Challenge Google and Shift the Content Equation?
- HP's Mark Hurd
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- 9 Stocks That Play Rising Water Costs: Strategists
- Weis' Deal Likely Won't Change Big Money Contracts
- Gold Prices Can Double in 3 Years: Portfolio Manager
- Nov. 23: Unusual Volume Leaders
- Help Wanted—Please Run $4 Billion University
- Apple Comes to AT&T's Rescue
- Tuesday's Heavy Dose of Data to Dictate 'Risk' Behavior
- Obama says Boosting US Jobs is Top Priority
- More Consumers Giving 'Black Friday' the Cold Shoulder
- Prepare For Large Decline In Stocks, Next Year?
- Appeals Court Denies Microsoft's Alcatel Petition
- HP Comes in As Expected; Is It Time to Buy?
- Cramer: What Monday’s Housing Number Really Means
- Why the Dollar Will Likely Stay Weak for Some Time
- US Officials Press Pay Czar to Ease AIG Curbs: Report
RSS FEED
CNBC Guest Blog
Text Size 
William Dunkelberg
Economic Strategist,
Boenning & Scattergood
Administration officials have admitted that the “Stimulus Package” hasn’t been very stimulating.
So now, some in Congress are considering “Stimulus II”, which may take the form of a jobs tax credit similar to that enacted in 1976-77. Some feel this was a successful program, creating new jobs. But it is likely that “government job creation” is an oxymoron. Government has no money to hire someone or subsidize the hiring of a worker.
 |
Such a program does not pass a simple “smell test” of logic.
Even a minimum wage worker costs about $20,000 (all in).
Who would spend $20,000 to get a $3000 credit, for example, if there were no use for the worker (e.g. the worker could not generate more than $17,000 in revenue to cover the cost of hiring).
Firms will not hire people to just stand around, and cannot pay workers more than the revenue they generate for the firm. With weak consumer demand, more workers are apparently not needed and owners are not hiring.
A jobs credit won't bring in more sales.
Such a program, if passed, would be the “cash for clunkers” program for the job market, pulling hiring into the tax credit period from future periods. Hiring might even be delayed in anticipation of the program if it is proposed in Congress and debated for a period of time. And, unless prevented, such a subsidy proposal might induce some firms to release workers and re-hire them as “new”.
Such a program will involve red tape and complex formulas to compute credits, and most if not all of the money will be paid for workers that would be hired anyway. All this would not induce many consumers to increase their spending, the top need identified by business owners. Labor is cheap, customers are needed. Maybe giving the money to consumers would be simpler.
When consumer spending picks up, firms will have reason to hire (and banks will have a reason to lend to them when asked).
___________________
William Dunkelberg is an Economic Strategist, Boenning & Scattergood and Chief Economist, National Federation of Independent Business.
Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes